Separation of Chapter and Community

24 07 2008

論會社分離

Some days before, I mention a term “Separation of Chapter and Community". Somehow, I’m sorry to see that some of the wikipedians keep misuse my concept. Though I respected their interpretation, but I have to state my own.

某年月日,在下曾在某維基計畫的某個頁面上提出「會社分離」一字,然某些人等對此字常以斷章取義。無奈需加以釋法,以正視聽。

The simplified explanation of such concept is to give to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s. In terms of the church and the government share the seat and office, launch event together, it shall follow the will and procedure of the both parties. For those who have identities or posts in both parties, the separation is in mind rather than in form. That’s what I mean “Separation of Chapter and Community".

簡單這個概念是上帝歸上帝,凱撒歸凱撒。至於教會和政府是否共處一地,同時辦公,合作搞活動,就要尊重雙方意志和程序。有身分重疊者,應該將社群和協會事務,心態上分開處理,是為「會社分離」。

The rights of speaking in both parties, of those who have identities or posts in both parties, shall be respected, like the (Provisional) directors of the chapter. If anyone stated some personal views as the decision of the chapter rashly, that is unacceptable. As the Directory shall administrates the Company with collective leadership and responsibility, any opinion without discussion and confirmation of the Directory shall not be view as a decision of the chapter. For those who in community or chapter, acknowledge this and behave appropriately according to this principle could be view as another POV of “Separation of Chapter and Community".

但身分重疊者,如協會理事,在社群中發表獨立個人意見的權力應該受到尊重。若任何人等輕易將個人意見等同協會意志的行為,是不可以接受,而且應該收到譴責。作為集體決策的協會,未經(臨時)理事會會商的事情,理論上不能算作協會的意志。沒有身分重疊的人,應該理事作為社群成員發表個人意見的權力,不應輕易上綱上線,把個人意見當作協會意志,可以視之為另一層次的「會社分離」。

I’m sorry to see somebody around keep using the phrase; agreeing such phrase verbally; demanding the others to achieve it in form; but stated some personal views as the decision of the chapter rashly. Personally, I don’t think such behaviour is based on the mind set of “Separation of Chapter and Community". I’m afraid I have to use “malicious" to describe such behaviour and have to say that such behaviour had damage the healthy relationship of the Community and the Chapter.

但很遺憾,某些人言語間認同這個概念,要求別人拘泥於形式上的達成,還未經調查便將理事的個人意見輕易上綱上線,心態上儼然是背道而馳,某程度上這是頗為惡毒的行為,可能更有離間社群和協會關係之嫌。


管理項目

Information

發表迴響

在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / 變更 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / 變更 )

Facebook照片

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / 變更 )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / 變更 )

連結到 %s




%d 位部落客按了讚: